Rhody and I were in Capitola to attend to a few important tasks. Consequently, I did not take any pictures from home or work. My ‘Six’ for this week are therefore totally random without a theme.

1. Liquidambar styraciflua, sweetgum does not require much chill to exhibit exemplary foliar color for autumn. This deep garnet red is almost too dark to be visually appealing. It looks like it should be in Vermont rather than here on the Central Coast of California.

2. Archontophoenix cunninghamiana, king palm is more common closer to Los Angeles than here. I know of only a few here, and almost all are somewhat shabby like these are. King palm is less tolerant of slightly excessive chill than sweetgum is of inadequate chill.

3. Eucalyptus citriodora, lemon gum is also more common in Southern California, likely because it prefers warmer winters. Although these are reasonably happy here, not many are so happy within the Santa Clara Valley on the other side of the Santa Cruz Mountain.

4. Cortaderia jubata, pampas grass is the aggressively invasive sort which is naturalized so wickedly on the West Coast of California and Oregon. This is not a good picture, since it shows only its bloom peeking above the edge of the cliff, with foliage concealed below.

5. Eucalyptus globulus, blue gum is another aggressively invasive naturalized species. It has a completely different personality, though. Where it competes with other tall trees, it grows very high, and is very combustible. This exposed tree is relatively short and stout.

6. Carpobrotus edulis, Hottentot fig, which most of us know incorrectly as ice plant, was imported from South Africa more than a century ago, and is now so abundant that some believe that it is native. Technically, it is invasive too, but it is not easy to dislike as such.

This is the link for Six on Saturday, for anyone else who would like to participate: https://thepropagatorblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/18/six-on-saturday-a-participant-guide/

4 thoughts on “Six on Saturday: Day Out

  1. I don’t think that pampas grass photo is inadequate in any way. In fact, as I looked through the six, that’s the photo I found most appealing (despite the plant’s invasiveness, etc.) It’s quite artistic, at least to my eye.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The picture does not show its foliage though. I dislike it because the foliage inflicts nasty paper cuts. However, it is quite pretty. This particular species is a bit sloppier than the other (Cortaderia selloana), since the long leaves do not stand up very tall, leaving their long tips to dag on the ground. Some think that is how pampas grass should look though.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment