Bare root fruit trees will be available in about a month. It is probably my favorite time of year for going to nurseries. (Since I grow just about everything I want from bits of landscape debris, I do not often go to retail nurseries.) It is also rather frustrating to see what sorts of bare root material are popular nowadays, and what sorts are not. Horticulture has gotten so ridiculous!
Most of the formerly common cultivars of fruit trees that I remember are no longer available. They were common for a reason. They perform well here. Retailers used to select cultivars for their respective regions, instead of pimping out weird new but unproven cultivars, or just taking the same faddish cultivars that get sent to other stores within a vast chain of big box stores.
One of the weirdest of fads are multi-grafted fruit trees and roses.
Multi-grafts are certainly not new technology. Back when horticulture was taken more seriously, fruit trees for home gardens (which might be the only ones of their kind in their respective gardens) were sometimes, if needed, outfitted with a secondary scion of a pollinating cultivar. The pollinator could be pruned low and subordinated, as long as it bloomed with a few flowers.
Most of us preferred to simply plant two separate trees that could pollinate each other. If one was less desirable than the other, it was just maintained as a smaller tree so that it would not occupy so much space that could be utilized by more desirable types. Each tree had its own uncrowded area. If one succumbed to disease, it did not necessarily affect those associated with it.
Multi-graft trees are not so easy. If the trunk of a multi-graft pear tree gets infested with fire blight, all the scions grafted to it succumb. Because almost no one prunes them properly, the most vigorous cultivars dominate and crowd the less vigorous. Even well pruned trees are always asymmetrical because each cultivar exhibits a different growth rate and branch structure.
Multi-graft rose standards (trees) just look weird and freakishly unnatural. Pruning must ensure that one cultivar does not crowd out the other, just like for fruit trees. The multi-graft rose in the picture above was planted with three others just like it. Two of them crowded out one of their two scions. It would have been easier to simply plant two in white and two in burgundy.
Multi-graft plants are useful only if ground space is very limited, but air space is not. For example, such a tree planted in a hole in a deck can extend limbs over the deck where other trees can not live. If maintained properly and separately, each part can produce its share of fruit in season. I once did this with a pear tree that was espaliered on a fence over a concrete driveway.
When I was a kid, my father bought an apple tree that grew 5 different kinds of apples. It did not last long.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apples and pears are the two types of fruit trees that are the most practical to manage with multiple grafts. The various cultivars are rather cooperative with each other. However, it is devastating when a single tree with multiple grafts succumbs to fire blight after all that work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have never been a fan of that either. It seems kind of weird…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did not expect much agreement. Most people are impressed by them.
I might get a ‘Satsuma’ plum, which supposedly needs a pollinator. That was not a concern for the trees I knew when I was a kid, because there were other plums in the neighborhood. If mine really needs a pollinator, I might graft a bit of another appropriate cultivar onto it, just for a few flowers. I certainly would not mind a few odd plums too. Otherwise, I have not use for multi-grafts anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Tony Tomeo and commented:
You know, as much as I dislike multi-grafts, I feel compelled to prune the multi-grafted roses in such a manner that one scion does not overwhelm another.
LikeLike