P80307Pollarding and coppicing are bad words to most American arborists. These extreme pruning techniques are considered to be synonymous with topping. Yet, both have been around for centuries, and have actually kept some trees alive and productive significantly longer than they would naturally live.

Rather than redundantly explaining what pollarding and coppicing are, and why they are useful arboricultural techniques, I will provide this link to an article I wrote about them earlier: https://tonytomeo.wordpress.com/2018/02/12/pollarding-and-coppicing-pruning-techniques/

I am one of the rare American arborists who not only condone pollarding and coppicing, but I also use these techniques when necessary. I will be coppicing red twig dogwood soon so that it produces more vigorous red twigs next year, and also because we can not allow it to grow wild as a thicket. Some of my fig trees will get pollarded to make vigorous shoots for cuttings, and also to keep them contained in their minimal space. Both techniques are very effective if done properly.

I must stress the word ‘properly’.

Improperly executed pollarding or coppicing really is disfiguring, and can be disastrous. Yet, it is done quite often by those who get payed to maintain landscapes!

The picture above illustrates a remarkably well pollarded flowering pear tree. It was obviously done by an arborist who knows how to pollard in the English style. Although it is difficult to see in the picture, the knuckles were pruned back cleanly last year, leaving no stubble. The vigorous secondary shoots developed mostly from the knuckles, with only a few stems emerging from lower on the main limbs. When this tree gets pollarded again (and it may have already been pollarded since this picture was taken last week), it should get pruned back to the same knuckles.

The pictures below show some sort of magnolia that was severely disfigured by maintenance ‘gardeners’, probably for no other reason than it was within their reach. A magnolia can not bloom if all of the stems from the previous year get pruned off by pollarding. This magnolia happened to bloom with a few distorted flowers only because the pollarding was so poorly done, that long stubs remain. These flowers are really nothing to look at within the context of all this unsightly disfigured stems. The long stubs can not be compartmentalized as the new growth develops in spring, so will remain as open and decaying wounds as the tree matures.

So, what is the point of this magnolias even being in the landscape? It contribute nothing. It can not bloom. It can not grow into a tree, but is unappealing as shrubbery. It will always be disfigured. The disfigurement will eventually compromise its health. It would be best if it were merely removed, or at least coppiced and allowed to regenerate. Even if it is a grafted tree, and gets coppiced below the graft, the resulting growth would be an improvement, and might actually bloom if the ‘gardeners’ do not ruing it again.P80307+P80307++

14 thoughts on “the Good, the Bad, and they’re both UGLY!

    1. It has its applications, but is so unnatural. I would do it for a Norway maple with dark foliage, like ‘Crimson King’, just to get the deep dark foliage, but such a tree would just be a foliage tree, not a shade tree. I do it for certain figs that have better late figs than early figs. Pollarding eliminates all early figs, but makes for really excellent late figs. Yet, the trees are so ugly.


  1. That poor Magnolia! Someone put it out of its misery! So does that pear tree bear more flowers and fruit with all those little stems? The arborist practice that I object to is pruning trees into cubes. This seems to be very popular in France and some other European countries.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh, the cubes! Ick. Some landscapers with something to prove will try that here, but gardeners do not know how to maintain them. The pollarded pear will not bloom because new stems start from scratch annually. However, the foliage is very clean (without pear blight), and colors excellently in autumn.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I see a lot of examples of ugly pollarding around here, although I’m inclined to call it butchering. Some clown in a pickup truck with a chain saw drives by and offers to “trim” some witless homeowner’s oak or maple tree and the next year it’s a big, ugly bird’s nest. No one ever cleans up the mess. I’m guessing they promise the homeowner they’ll have fewer leaves.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I wish they’d get fined here. It’s as if they suddenly decide they don’t like the tree that’s been growing in their yard for 30 years and want to try some bonsai on it.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Although I do happen to like well pollarded trees that are conducive to the technique, I would prefer that a tree that is not conducive to it got cut down rather than tortured.


  3. I’ve seen it done in English gardens and in my hometown of Williamsburg VA to a huge sycamore tree. Amazing to think the sycamore is maintained at those heights annually. But what is done so often in the South is commonly called “crape murder,” to the crape myrtle trees. It is torture!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Pollarding can be very effective for crape myrtles, but is more often done improperly. Right near where I got the pictures of the flowering pear and magnolia, there are many crape myrtles pruned like the magnolia. They look disfigured throughout the year. I really do not see the point of such bad pruning. The trees should either not be pruned, or be pruned properly. It is not that difficult to do it properly.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Reblogged this on Tony Tomeo and commented:

    Extreme Horridculture warning! This recycled article most definitely conforms to the meme. It is amazing that such hack jobs are tolerated and actually payed for. Believe it or not, these are not the worst examples.
    There is at least one arborist in the region who performs exemplary pollarding, and maintains the sycamore that provided the illustration for the articles that I wrote about the topic earlier. It must be incredibly frustrating for such qualified professionals to see such mutilated trees!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s