Rhody’s rhodies were spectacular in bloom. This year, I refrained from posting too many pictures of them by posting none at all. I thought that I might get a few at the end of the season; but now find that the few that remain are either shabby or difficult to get a good picture of. There is plenty of other bloom though, even without exploitation of the warm season annuals. Now that daylilies are blooming, they will continue until autumn. Roses continue at least as late, but bloom in phases since most are partially shaded. All but one of these six species were recycled, although one was recycled by remaining where it was.

1. Daylily is not actually a lily. With all the bickering amongst botanists, its classification remains vague. This surplus from thinning a congested colony now borders the iris bed.

2. White climbing rose that was removed from the garden of a renovated cabin has been relocated to el Catedral de Santa Clara de Los Gatos, where merely white flowers bloom.

3. Rose lily that was plumply budded for Six on Saturday two weeks ago is now finishing. It recycled itself from a previous froufrou garden as the rose garden was installed over it.

4. Carpet rose was originally too close to a walkway, so was relocated to a wide roadside embankment. I am none too keen on carpet rose, but it is appropriate for its application.

5. Easter lily that was left from a wedding at el Catedral de Santa Clara de Los Gatos was added to the perennials across the road, but could have remained with the white flowers.

6. Unidentified hybrid tea rose, which had the color but not the form of ‘Double Delight’ before it began to fade, blooms in the rose garden, which was installed over the rose lily.

This is the link for Six on Saturday, for anyone else who would like to participate: https://thepropagatorblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/18/six-on-saturday-a-participant-guide/

5 thoughts on “Six on Saturday: No Rhododendrons

    1. Gads! The rose lily mocks me! It knows that I am none too keen on it, but it also knows that I will not relocate it. If I really wanted to, I could separate it from the roots of the lavender and roses. The problem is that it has become something of a tradition. Those who are familiar with it expect it to bloom there and disrupt the symmetry of the rose garden that I would otherwise strive for! I moved the original bulbs maybe three years ago, but another grew from a scale that remained. While the relocated bulbs languished, the new bulb in the original location grew into the small colony that is there now. There will be more of them next year. Anyway, rhododendrons finished bloom quite a while ago, but a few late blooms linger. They just happen to be up on top of large specimens, where I can not reach them. Besides, they are deteriorating.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Exactly; that is why it remains! Those who are familiar with it are fond of it, and might miss it if it were relocated. It looks pink to me though, rather than lilac. I am not so proficient with color.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Chris Mousseau Cancel reply